Discussion:
Changing the tone of alt.education.distance
(too old to reply)
g-gollin
2006-01-14 19:55:55 UTC
Permalink
I find myself wondering if it would work to change the overall tone at
alt.education.distance by posting accurate information here, all the
while refraining from engagement with posts that are of the sort that
have sometimes appeared in recent months on the militaryforums.com
distance learning forum.

The internet affords remarkable opportunities for curriculum delivery
via distance learning, but the financial possibilities so attached are
also a draw to illegitimate organizations that do not provide
education, but merely pretend to. Perhaps the set of individuals who
post the insulting nonsense that can clog unmoderated education fora is
a mix of people who have acquired substandard degrees, are financially
linked to illegitimate "universities," view government regulation of
higher education as an infringement on individual liberties associated
with consumer-provider relationships, or some combination. In any
event, their participation in a discussion forum through submission of
highly offensive posts, instead of through rational, honest
presentation of their views, is unproductive and does not help bring
distance learning further into the world as an accepted form of
instruction.

If those of us who know something about higher education programs, and
who may have been posting elsewhere, were to resume contribution to
"AED" perhaps we could learn to ignore the material that we might
expect to be suppressed in a moderated forum, rather than walking away
in disgust and leaving AED to be as it has been in recent times.

It is interesting to contemplate the liberation of
alt.education.distance through persistent good behavior.
f***@yahoo.com
2006-01-14 20:16:14 UTC
Permalink
What a hypocrite. Is this is the same George Gollin who says:

""These sons of bitches who smell money are just using the situation
there for their own ends," says Gollin. "They're monsters.
They're just disgusting monsters.""

http://indy.pabn.org/news.php?id=140

What he wants is for you to shut up while he spouts off unopposed.

The question he still isn't answering is when he first knew that
degreeinfo.com was connected to pedophile porn peddlers. The silence
is deafening.

How about a "rational, honest presentation" on that topic, Dr. Toe
Licker?
Dennis Ruhl
2006-01-15 16:11:23 UTC
Permalink
George

Noble thought but AED is a release mechanism for those who disagre
with opinions elsewhere but are not allow to post such disagreement.

While I personally would never ;) use unmoderated forums to stat
opinions that would cause me problems elsewhere, many do and I don'
think it will change.

Try degreeboard

--
Dennis Ruh
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Ruhl's Profile: 12
View this thread: http://forums.degreeboard.com/showthread.php?t=920
FarQ
2006-01-16 11:21:23 UTC
Permalink
Fark - don't let him now bugger up degreeboard!

His arsehole friends farked up AED, then even farked up their own
little club, and this lying mongrel wants to come back to AED?

Not farking likely.
t***@gmail.com
2015-12-28 13:34:03 UTC
Permalink
George Gollin has been convicted of violating the Illinois State Employees and Officials Ethics Act and fined $5,000. George Gollin "knowingly and intentionally used his state-provided email account to engage in prohibited political activity." George Gollin admitted he knew he was misappropriating state resources when he sent "dozens" of campaign emails with his university email. The Executive Ethics Commission levied a $5,000 fine against George Gollin, the maximum allowed under the statute.

https://www.illinois.gov/oeig/Documents/14EEC011_Gollin_06_25_15.pdf
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...