Microsoft is Smarter Then I

[Big Crotch on a Small Fish]

"Snit" wrote in

I just realized Microsoft is smarter than I.
Think about it. I am simply too stupid to decide what software to
install
on my PC. Things like the Ask.com toolbar. Despite unchecking that
little
box, Microsoft was kind enough to override my decision and
install the Ask.com toolbar anyway.
Thank you Microsoft!
Thank you Ask!
Thank you Acro Software (makers of CutePDF)!
Grisoft? Here's a big virtual hug for you too. Maybe I should
just let Microsoft run my entire machine?
As proof of my severe lack of intelligence I am posting
screenshots. Here is the installation of CutePDF, as you can see
the Ask.com checkbox is
unchecked.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/54b9c2116635395
Here is IE after the install.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/8dc6fa116635394
Isn't that great? Because Ask.com is so awesome it has to be
installed without users' consent.

<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/CutePDF.mov>
Odd... we see very different things as we install CutePDF. No
toolbars added to my main browser or to IE.
Oh, and MS did not install anything when you installed CutePDF.

Justin is related to Gortard or WronG. I hope. Surely there cant be
two families with such clueleness. He is blaming MS for what a 3rd
party app installs AND he opted for. Can you believe it??!!!?!?!?!
No wonder WronG spent 90% of his day "fighting malware". He's the
idiot who said "yes" when prompted to install the ProN virus of the
day. Streuth. Just as I think "advocates" couldnt get any dumber.

I am curious why his screenshots look so different from the
installation from the software from the site.
--
[INSERT .SIG HERE]
I must be modifying them in Photoshop for the express purpose of
discrediting Windows.
That’s the only logical answer!

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college he
did not really work.

[High Plains Thumper]

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael? Adds credence to the saying, "Those who can do, those who can't
teach." Sad.

99- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with his
inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that dishonest
retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock" 30 Jan 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3166f6fda92641b

43- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe Crump and
ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he is the classic ad
hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable, but then it always degrades
into name calling bullying, the responder is a liar, etc. AKA the Snit
Circus of Pathological Lies. Perhaps the times he seems reasonable are
when he is properly controlled by medication." 21 Sep 2010

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/249a598ec5aafe85

[Snit]

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.

You are a hypocrite.

By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks. I do
not use socks.

[flatfish+++]

Post by Snit

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.
You are a hypocrite.
By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks. I do
not use socks.

George Hostler's socks are scattered all over COLA at the moment.
They are really stinking up the place!

[Snit]

Post by flatfish+++

Post by Snit

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.
You are a hypocrite.
By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks. I do
not use socks.

George Hostler's socks are scattered all over COLA at the moment.
They are really stinking up the place!

He whines whenever ever anyone says he is using a sock... and then in the
next breath accused me of having Steve Carroll as my sock... something
clearly not true.

HyPocriTe.

[Steve Carroll]

Post by Snit

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.
You are a hypocrite.
By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks.  I do
not use socks.

Translation: Snit has gotten busted using sock by multiple people on
multiple occasions. Strangely, for some reason, Snit still seems to
believe that people are as stupid as he needs them to be... as shown
again here... where he is trying to pin one of his sock puppets on a
person for whom there is no evidence of having ever used sock puppets
(and there's a good reason for that).

[Tim Adams]

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Snit

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.
You are a hypocrite.
By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks.  I do
not use socks.

Translation: Snit has gotten busted using sock by multiple people on
multiple occasions. Strangely, for some reason, Snit still seems to
believe that people are as stupid as he needs them to be... as shown
again here... where he is trying to pin one of his sock puppets on a
person for whom there is no evidence of having ever used sock puppets
(and there's a good reason for that).

is snit's still posting that same old lie of his?
Funny how he has admitted using socks (Sigmund and Brock MacNugget come to mind).

[Snit]

Tim Adams stated in post

Post by Tim Adams

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Snit

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Big Crotch on a Small Fish

That I've seen Snit is the only person in cola or csma that has forged
documents.

Didn't you bust him forging his identy and claiming to work at a college
he did not really work.

So, Snit couldn't leave enough alone that he must reply using socks, right
Michael?

When people accuse you of using socks you claim it is an ad hominem attack,
but here you are making the same accusation against others.
You are a hypocrite.
By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks.  I do
not use socks.

Translation: Snit has gotten busted using sock by multiple people on
multiple occasions. Strangely, for some reason, Snit still seems to
believe that people are as stupid as he needs them to be... as shown
again here... where he is trying to pin one of his sock puppets on a
person for whom there is no evidence of having ever used sock puppets
(and there's a good reason for that).

is snit's still posting that same old lie of his?
Funny how he has admitted using socks (Sigmund and Brock MacNugget come to mind).
--
regarding Snit "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting
the newsgroup." Andrew J. Brehm

I do not use socks, Tim... but remember you were busted doing so and then
claimed it must have been someone else supporting your lies from the same
Internet café. That was funny.

[High Plains Thumper]

Post by Steve Carroll

By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks. I
do not use socks.

Translation: Snit has gotten busted using sock by multiple people on
multiple occasions. Strangely, for some reason, Snit still seems to
believe that people are as stupid as he needs them to be... as shown
again here... where he is trying to pin one of his sock puppets on a
person for whom there is no evidence of having ever used sock puppets
(and there's a good reason for that).

is snit's still posting that same old lie of his? Funny how he has
admitted using socks (Sigmund and Brock MacNugget come to mind).

Yup. "Big Crotch on a Small Fish" is a Snit sock, which Snit vehemently
denies, follows in the footsteps of other Snit socks, i.e., Joel Crump,
Rhino Plastee, ceed, Omar Murad Asfour, Steve Carroll's Dog and ad
nauseum. Snit can't exist without sock puppets. They are the only ones who
console him.

Sandman did thorough research to prove Snit uses socks:

http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet

(If you look to the menu at the right of Sandman's webpage, it has other
articles of interest (or non-interest) of Snit's trolling methods.)

[Snit]

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Steve Carroll

By the way, as you well know, Big Crotch is one of Carroll's socks. I
do not use socks.

Translation: Snit has gotten busted using sock by multiple people on
multiple occasions. Strangely, for some reason, Snit still seems to
believe that people are as stupid as he needs them to be... as shown
again here... where he is trying to pin one of his sock puppets on a
person for whom there is no evidence of having ever used sock puppets
(and there's a good reason for that).

is snit's still posting that same old lie of his? Funny how he has
admitted using socks (Sigmund and Brock MacNugget come to mind).

Yup. "Big Crotch on a Small Fish" is a Snit sock,

Nope. You made that up.

Post by High Plains Thumper
which Snit vehemently denies, follows in the footsteps of other Snit socks,
i.e., Joel Crump, Rhino Plastee, ceed, Omar Murad Asfour, Steve Carroll's Dog
and ad nauseum. Snit can't exist without sock puppets. They are the only ones
who console him.
http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet

Which has been completely debunked many times.

Post by High Plains Thumper
(If you look to the menu at the right of Sandman's webpage, it has other
articles of interest (or non-interest) of Snit's trolling methods.)

Sandman has many pages of lies about me.

[Chance Furlong]

This post might be inappropriate. Click to display it.

[Snit]

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Snit
Sandman has many pages of lies about me.

Prove it

<http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
<http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>

And many more... he is obsessed with lying about me.

[Steve Carroll]

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

    <http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
    <http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

[Chance Furlong]

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Snit

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

<http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
<http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

[Snit]

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Snit

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

<http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
<http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

Carroll forged text in my posts. You see, he thinks it is clever to pretend
I was suggesting Sandman's lies are in any way honest. Then again, Sandman
has suggested he gets paid for his trolling site - which means Carroll
likely is one of the ones who pays him.

Each of those links, of course, is filled with Sandman's lies about me. I
have shown this over and over and over and over and over... for example, the
whole "tilde" debate he shows says *nothing* about the fact Tim Adams was
ignorant about what the tilde meant, which is what the "debate" is about (no
real debate, nobody thinks Tim knew - but his friends will not admit to it).
And the "gibberish" BS Sandman posts is completely debunked here:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/coherent_gibberish.mov> and the


And Carroll's BS about my site is refuted here:
<http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/site.mov>

These guys just make things up and spew lies and lies and lies. It is
repulsive. Heck, from a post from some time ago:

===============================================================

1 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>

Sandman defends Wally's absurd actions, shown here:

<http://goo.gl/h1SL>

Clearly Wally is just flat out wrong and ignorant here. The text Wally
calls "coherent and well ordered" is just randomly put together sentenced
made from a filler-text generator. There is *no* reasoned defense for his
BS. None. But Sandman tries (sorta... what a sad, sad "try"):

Sandman: admitting I am right!
-----
The quote comes from a DreamWeaver plugin which can
insert placeholder text in HTML files in DreamWeaver.
It's called "Lorum and More" and one of the filler
settings are "Corporate Mumbo-Jumbo".
...
The text in question is indeed created by this plugin
and is indeed just random sentences thrown together.
-----

Sandman, tying his best to make sense of the gibberish:
-----
So, even though the sentences are randomly put
together, they are hardly nonsense, and hardly
gibberish.
-----

Sandman makes it very clear he knows I am right... and then contradicts
himself in the same sentence where he admits they sentences are "randomly
put together"! LOL Yeah, Sandman, you call Wally's "coherent and well
ordered" text "randomly put together"... and this somehow in your wee little
brain makes him right!

===============================================================

2 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>

Sandman whines about my pointing out how he lied about his CSS not
validating. There is no doubt his CSS did not validate (which is not a big
deal) and it has been proved he lied about it (which Sandman freaked out
about being caught). Repeatedly.

<http://goo.gl/nVNI>

Sandman cannot let it go: he was busted lying... and is still crying about
it years later. Of special note: the WayBackMachine's data is part of the
evidence that proves Sandman lied... but Sandman denies this proves he lied.
Yet, below (in #5), Sandman uses the WayBackMachine as part of his faulty
evidence... showing he later flip flops on even that!

===============================================================

3 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>

Sandman whines that I returned context he dishonestly snipped. Yes, that is
his whole complaint against me. Sandman was offended by... gasp!... the
fact I am honest and honorable. Not even he could find a counter-example.

===============================================================

4 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>

Tim Adams made a complete idiot out of himself and said the following:

Tim Adams:
-----
YOU were the person claiming that the ~ told people to go to
HardDrive/users/username/ while I stated the ~ indicated the
name of the hard drive only. To bad in your reading, your
delusions took over.
-----
Gee, they all support me and the location. Hard drive (or in
their case ~) /library/widget. NOT the
~/users/username/library/widget as at least one other person
said, and you agreed with a day or so ago.
-----
As such, when the articles YOU directed me to indicated that
widgets were at ~/library/widgets THE ARTICLES WERE USING
THE ~ AS THE NAME OF THE HARD DRIVE AND NOT THE FULL PATH
harddrive/user/username/library
-----

Sandman tries to defend Tim by making up a story about what my saying
"Ouch!" must mean (it shows, in Sandman's world, *agreement*). Then Sandman
says:

Sandman:
-----
And this is the typical Snit circus. Snit is again
found to tell others what they meant in spite of them
just outlining precisely what they meant.
-----

Yes: Sandman cannot find an example of my doing as he does, telling others
what they must mean, but then chastises me for *his* own actions.

===============================================================

5 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>

Sandman tries to show how I have done wrong, but ends up calling *his own
attempt at evidence* an "obfuscation" and that *his own attempt at evidence*
should not be trusted. Great job, Sandman. The following video shows the
specifics:

<http://goo.gl/drHK>

Yeah, Sandman, great "evidence" there. LOL! You show that my claims are
supported and admit yours should not be trusted.

Worse than that, Sandman used the WayBackMachine as part of his
"evidence"... the very source he denies is accurate in his attempts to
defend his lies about his CSS!

===============================================================

6 <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>

Steve Carroll admitted he posted as his "dog", and because of this, Sandman
conclude there is no doubt I posted as Steve's Dog, and this Steve's other
socks must be mine. Huh? Does Sandman think Steve and I are the same
person? There is no other possible answer to his BS... well, other than the
fact he is a lying moron.

===============================================================

[Steve Carroll]

Post by Snit

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

     <http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

Carroll forged text in my posts.

Forged text? Text may have gotten altered, not really sure... and if
it was it may have been my dog. Seems he got up to the keyboard again.

Stop pretending that people do what you do, Mr. Forger.

[Steve Carroll]

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

     <http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
     <http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

Read it again.

[High Plains Thumper]

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

 <http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
<http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

Read it again.

Chance is being facetious. OTOH, Snit seems proud of his trolling
achievements as documented by Sandman. Else why would he post Sandman's
proof of Snit's trolling? It's like a badge of courage for trolls, just
like the 148 Poster Quotes on the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies.

These are just examples of Snit begging for attention. As usual.

[Snit]

Post by High Plains Thumper

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Post by Steve Carroll

Post by Chance Furlong

Sandman has many pages that point out newsgroup trolls.

Prove it

 <http://csma.sandman.net/atlas/faq/index.php?faq=sigmond>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Css_Validation>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Gibberish>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_New_Sock_Puppet>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Quote_Forging>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/Michael_Digest_Tilde>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/PDFforgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/pages/ScreenshotForgery>
<http://csma.sandman.net/plain/ascii.php?name=Snit>
<http://csma.sandman.net/TrollScoring/Snit>
And many more... he has been particularly accurate in documenting my trolling.

I agree.

You agree Sandman trolls? I don't recall him trolling.

Read it again.

Chance is being facetious.

Right: everyone knows Sandman lies and trolls. Heck, the proof has been
posted many, many times - and above Sandman incriminates himself.

Post by High Plains Thumper
OTOH, Snit seems proud of his trolling
achievements as documented by Sandman.

I am "proud" Sandman, you and Carroll obsess and lie about me? No. That is
stupid.

...